<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exoconsciousness with Dr. Rebecca Hardcastle &#8211; Paranormal Podcast 103</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jimharold.com/the-paranormal-podcast/exoconsciousness-with-dr-rebecca-hardcastle-paranormal-podcast-103/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jimharold.com/the-paranormal-podcast/exoconsciousness-with-dr-rebecca-hardcastle-paranormal-podcast-103/</link>
	<description>Listen to over 150 free paranormal programs about UFOs, ghosts, psychics and everything paranormal.  Includes interviews with paranormal experts and your spooky stories.  Explore the unknown with Jim Harold.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:29:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stellarsoulartist</title>
		<link>http://jimharold.com/the-paranormal-podcast/exoconsciousness-with-dr-rebecca-hardcastle-paranormal-podcast-103/comment-page-1/#comment-3194</link>
		<dc:creator>stellarsoulartist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimharold.com/?p=2114#comment-3194</guid>
		<description>I am relistening to this cast and have to asterix my comment above- the &#039;youngering&#039; concept and some of her ideas about the fact that we can live centuries long does not seem to have any basis in material reality. Though, there are labratory studies being done right now that are working on the manipulation of &#039;oldering&#039; genes in worms- this is far from a viable science for humans. Also, if humans are capable of this- is any other biological life that is as well? Why do they also get old and die...and if belief system is the main cause for this as she posits-  then do...dogs believe they get old much sooner than we do? This idea she has is interesting, simply not grounded in any biological reality- though I believe that we are multi-dimensional beings, I also believe we are subject (particularily our biological matter) to the &#039;laws&#039; of the material plane. These &#039;laws&#039; may be subject to, not only, the great forces of energy that make up the material world as we know it, and not least, to our own energy and potentials, but to say that it is simply possible today to live for centuries by beliving that we can is - in my view- a little too out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am relistening to this cast and have to asterix my comment above- the &#8216;youngering&#8217; concept and some of her ideas about the fact that we can live centuries long does not seem to have any basis in material reality. Though, there are labratory studies being done right now that are working on the manipulation of &#8216;oldering&#8217; genes in worms- this is far from a viable science for humans. Also, if humans are capable of this- is any other biological life that is as well? Why do they also get old and die&#8230;and if belief system is the main cause for this as she posits-  then do&#8230;dogs believe they get old much sooner than we do? This idea she has is interesting, simply not grounded in any biological reality- though I believe that we are multi-dimensional beings, I also believe we are subject (particularily our biological matter) to the &#8216;laws&#8217; of the material plane. These &#8216;laws&#8217; may be subject to, not only, the great forces of energy that make up the material world as we know it, and not least, to our own energy and potentials, but to say that it is simply possible today to live for centuries by beliving that we can is &#8211; in my view- a little too out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stellarsoulartist</title>
		<link>http://jimharold.com/the-paranormal-podcast/exoconsciousness-with-dr-rebecca-hardcastle-paranormal-podcast-103/comment-page-1/#comment-3183</link>
		<dc:creator>stellarsoulartist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimharold.com/?p=2114#comment-3183</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed this show. This is food. I really love the way she merges her religious training with a broader understanding of what is spiritual consiousness, the reality of the universe and the world, based on what we understand is possible vis-a-vis quantum reality. I don&#039;t think she&#039;s too out there- I think she&#039;s simply connected which, unfortunately, in my view, is a relatively rare thing. If anyone looks deeply at theoretical science, current defence science (check out the BBC series &#039;The Future&#039; I think, Michio Kaku- my spelling might be off)- she&#039;s simply merging these aspects into a big picture. No doubt, this is not the accurate picture- I think we can&#039;t really know it fully because we are limited beings in this state of being as humans. However, like Dr.Hardcastle, I believe that we are multi-dimentional beings who are only aware of the tip of the tip of the iceburg in terms of what is possible, and what is &#039;real&#039;. 

I love the comment made on a more recent show (Feb2010) that &#039;the &quot;real&quot; world is but a spec in a gnat&#039;s eye.&#039; 

....so many of the worlds&#039; greatest minds and visionaries are called &#039;out there&#039; or crazy by their contemporaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed this show. This is food. I really love the way she merges her religious training with a broader understanding of what is spiritual consiousness, the reality of the universe and the world, based on what we understand is possible vis-a-vis quantum reality. I don&#8217;t think she&#8217;s too out there- I think she&#8217;s simply connected which, unfortunately, in my view, is a relatively rare thing. If anyone looks deeply at theoretical science, current defence science (check out the BBC series &#8216;The Future&#8217; I think, Michio Kaku- my spelling might be off)- she&#8217;s simply merging these aspects into a big picture. No doubt, this is not the accurate picture- I think we can&#8217;t really know it fully because we are limited beings in this state of being as humans. However, like Dr.Hardcastle, I believe that we are multi-dimentional beings who are only aware of the tip of the tip of the iceburg in terms of what is possible, and what is &#8216;real&#8217;. </p>
<p>I love the comment made on a more recent show (Feb2010) that &#8216;the &#8220;real&#8221; world is but a spec in a gnat&#8217;s eye.&#8217; </p>
<p>&#8230;.so many of the worlds&#8217; greatest minds and visionaries are called &#8216;out there&#8217; or crazy by their contemporaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://jimharold.com/the-paranormal-podcast/exoconsciousness-with-dr-rebecca-hardcastle-paranormal-podcast-103/comment-page-1/#comment-1558</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimharold.com/?p=2114#comment-1558</guid>
		<description>I mean no disrespect to this women. She seems like a very loving and caring individual. But this stuff is a little too out there for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean no disrespect to this women. She seems like a very loving and caring individual. But this stuff is a little too out there for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://jimharold.com/the-paranormal-podcast/exoconsciousness-with-dr-rebecca-hardcastle-paranormal-podcast-103/comment-page-1/#comment-1556</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimharold.com/?p=2114#comment-1556</guid>
		<description>Dr Hardcastle&#039;s views were &quot;interesting&quot; to say the least, but her attack on the Big Bang theory had absolutely no substance to it whatsoever. Her objections to the theory seemed to rest on semantics and her rather nebulous concept of &quot;cosmological consciousness&quot;. I was not impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Hardcastle&#8217;s views were &#8220;interesting&#8221; to say the least, but her attack on the Big Bang theory had absolutely no substance to it whatsoever. Her objections to the theory seemed to rest on semantics and her rather nebulous concept of &#8220;cosmological consciousness&#8221;. I was not impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digest of September 21st &#124; serious fix</title>
		<link>http://jimharold.com/the-paranormal-podcast/exoconsciousness-with-dr-rebecca-hardcastle-paranormal-podcast-103/comment-page-1/#comment-1535</link>
		<dc:creator>Digest of September 21st &#124; serious fix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimharold.com/?p=2114#comment-1535</guid>
		<description>[...] Exoconsciousness with Dr. Rebecca Hardcastle â€“ Paranormal Podcast 103.  Exoconsciousness with Dr. Rebecca Hardcastle â€“ Paranormal Podcast [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Exoconsciousness with Dr. Rebecca Hardcastle â€“ Paranormal Podcast 103.  Exoconsciousness with Dr. Rebecca Hardcastle â€“ Paranormal Podcast [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
